[petsc-dev] automatically updated git sample repositories

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>> I proposed putting them in a different place because we don't want those
>> big makefiles.
>
>    NO NO NO you misunderstand. The mini repositories would have
>    mirrored source code but NOT mirrored makefiles, they would have
>    simple makefiles.

Why do you want different makefiles in the different repos?

This is technically achievable, but I think we still have to worry about
people copying the example out of the source tree into ClearCase,
running ACME Eye Drops, and sending us winmail.dat.  One less layer to
unwrap if the makefile is the same in both places.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20140522/3bbda02b/attachment.sig>