[petsc-dev] CMake-assisted CUDA builds ready

[Nystrom, William D]

Hi Karli,

I ran a test build last night and it failed.  It was a relatively simple configuration where
I was downloading mpich and cmake and building with threads, cuda and the txpetscgpu
package.  I was building on a Fedora 17 machine with Cuda 5.  The failure seem to be
associated with cmake.  When I get home this evening, I could send you the configure
and make logs.  I did not have time this morning before leaving for work.  I wanted to
give you some early feedback even though the logs will have to wait till this evening.

Thanks,

Dave

--
Dave Nystrom
LANL HPC-5
Phone: 505-667-7913
Email: wdn at lanl.gov
Smail: Mail Stop B272
       Group HPC-5
       Los Alamos National Laboratory
       Los Alamos, NM 87545


________________________________________
From: petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov [petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of Karl Rupp [rupp at mcs.anl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 4:04 PM
To: petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] CMake-assisted CUDA builds ready

Hi Dave,

perfect, thanks!
I should add that a reconfigure is needed. It won't work with re-running
make only.

Best regards,
Karli


On 03/19/2013 04:59 PM, Nystrom, William D wrote:
> Hi Karli,
>
> I will try this soon and report back when I have results.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
> ________________________________________
> From: petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov [petsc-dev-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of Karl Rupp [rupp at mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:58 PM
> To: For users of the development version of PETSc
> Subject: [petsc-dev] CMake-assisted CUDA builds ready
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just merged the CMake-based builds for CUDA-packages into 'next',
> reducing compilation times considerably compared to the old legacy
> builds. While the legacy builds print something like
>    'libfast in <DIR>'
> the new CMake-based builds print the usual percentage counters in front.
>
> Any feedback on the proper functionality (both positive and negative)
> are appreciated.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Karli
>