[petsc-dev] threadcomm memory leak

[Jed Brown]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>   I totally agree it is a hack and should never be used, BUT as far as I
> was aware in no place in PETSc did we do that? If that is it should be
> fixed. But the fix is likely not forcing mpiuni to have two communicators
> it is just to do things right.


Do you not consider
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/169c19e9ea54to be a hack?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120716/7b5337f9/attachment.html>