Is c2html a required external package?

[Barry Smith]

    Please send us what you did so everyone can benefit from your fix.

    Barry

On Aug 8, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Shi Jin wrote:

> I managed to build a working c2html with playing with the compilers.  
> However, I do think it is a bug when --with-c2html=0 is set while it  
> is still required.
>
> Shi
>
> --
> Shi Jin, PhD
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
>> To: petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
>> Sent: Friday, August 8, 2008 11:58:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: Is c2html a required external package?
>>
>>
>>   If IBM compilers cannot compile c2html then they are buggy. c2html
>> is simple straightforward C code.
>> Let's see what is going wrong.
>>
>>    Barry
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect c2html does not compile with IBM compilers. We should
>>> support --with-c2html=0 option.
>>>
>>> Satish
>>>
>>> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Shi Jin
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was trying to build petsc-dev on a IBM AIX but failed at c2html.
>>>>> I tried not to use it with --with-c2html=0 but it seemed still be
>>>>> needed. Why do we need it? I don't need to generate documentations
>>>>> for this test.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> It is for documentation, but we do not consider an installation  
>>>> with
>>>> broken documentation fully functional. Can you send
>>>> the configure.log?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>    Matt
>>>>
>>>>> Shi
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Shi Jin, PhD
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>