[Nek5000-users] quasi 3D and boundary condition

nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 15 22:13:11 CDT 2014


Hi Paul

but for curved boundary, how you do so? I want to know the formula for what you mentioned as stress formula.

cheers
----------------------------------------------
Zhang Wei
waynezw0618 at gmail.com



On 16 Jun, 2014, at 11:09 am, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:

> 
> Assuming that the surface normal is x, y, or z, then it is simply
> 
>  U.nhat = 0
> 
> and Neumann on the other two boundaries.
> 
> Paul
> 
> ________________________
> ________________
> From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 9:15 PM
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [Nek5000-users] quasi 3D and boundary condition
> 
> Hi Paul
> what is implementation of SYM BC in NEK5000? I mean the variation formula.
> 
> 
> cheers
> ----------------------------------------------
> Zhang Wei
> waynezw0618 at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> On 9 Jun, 2014, at 4:15 am, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi Zhang,
>> 
>> There is no support for 2.5D with Fourier in z and currently no plans to move in that direction.
>> 
>> If you want a slip velocity on the curved surface you should use the stress formulation (lx2=lx1-2, etc.,
>> with ifstrs T.   Then the "SYM" bc should give you the desired bc, i.e., U.nhat = 0, d/dn (U.t_hat) = 0.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> _______________________________________
>> From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 10:03 AM
>> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> Subject: Re: [Nek5000-users] quasi 3D and boundary condition
>> 
>> Hi Paul
>> Thanks for replying.
>> for quasi-2D, I mean I wish to define the  velocity u(x,y,z) as sum(u(x,y,k)e^kz) to reduce the computational cost for really 3D case and also to avoid the long wave (which may longer then the geometry size in the z direction) in the axial direction.does nek currently support such feature?
>> 
>> for prescribe the bc on curl surface, I mean something like non-immersed bc and and have velocity component in the tangential direction, like in the potential theory.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> cheers
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Zhang Wei
>> waynezw0618 at gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8 Jun, 2014, at 10:44 pm, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Zhang,
>>> 
>>> You can use periodic boundary conditions in the z direction, provided you have at least 3
>>> elements in z.
>>> 
>>> Prescribed boundary conditions are given in Cartesian coordinates.  If you have the "mv "
>>> bc on your moving surface (i.e., the cylinder surface), along with the following things
>>> 
>>>     lx2=lx1-2
>>>     ly2=ly1-2
>>>     lz2=lz1-2
>>> 
>>> parameter (lx1m=lx1,ly1m=ly1,lz1m=lz1)
>>> 
>>> in SIZE, and T ifstrs, T ifmvbd in the .rea file, then the mesh will move with the fluid
>>> velocity (which you prescribe as Cartesian velocity vectors, u,v,w).    Note that nek
>>> uses an ALE formulation and the mesh motion must relatively limited or the mesh
>>> becomes too distorted.   For an oscillating cylinder, this should be ok (see
>>> www.mcs.anl.gov/~fischer/ocyl.gif).    I've just added a 2D oscillating cylinder case
>>> that illustrates the basic procedure to the examples suite.
>>> 
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 8:40 AM
>>> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> Subject: [Nek5000-users] quasi 3D and boundary condition
>>> 
>>> Hi Everyone.
>>> I am trying to run the flow past a cylinder case. I am going to move to the 3D simulation for my study. I have two questions:
>>> 1) how to run quasi 3D simulation in nek5000 ? if there is not existing code, andy suggestion to how to implement so?
>>> 2) how to specify the normal and tangential boundary condition for a curvature boundary?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Zhang Wei
>>> waynezw0618 at gmail.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users



More information about the Nek5000-users mailing list