[Nek5000-users] Periodic BC on non-parallel boundaries

[nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]

Hmm, just had a look at the code. It looks to me that it might work
out of the box. Why don't you give it a shot.

Cheers
Sefan

On 10/10/11, S K <stgeke at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Let me check what we need to change to make it happen.
> -Stefan
>
> On 10/10/11, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> Well then it seems I am stuck.  Might a work-around be possible for a 1/4
>> or
>> 1/2 annulus?  For instance with 1/2, I would just need to match (u,v) to
>> (-u,-v).
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM, <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> btw: I am afraid, the stress formulation doesn't support cyclic BCs at
>>> the moment!
>>> -Stefan
>>>
>>> On 10/10/11, S K <stgeke at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> > You are right, it's an undocumented AND experimental feature. Just
>>> > flag the boundaries as periodic. Yes, just add another IFCYCLIC line.
>>> > Currently, there is no stress formulation support for Pn/Pn.
>>> >
>>> > -Stefan
>>> >
>>> > On 10/10/11, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> > <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Stephan,
>>> >>
>>> >> I see, thanks.  I can`t find any documentation about cyclic BC`s.
>>> >> What
>>> >> is
>>> >> their symbol for the box file?  Also, I don`t see a logical switch
>>> >> for
>>> >> IFCYCLIC.  Do I just add another line?
>>> >>
>>> >> Also, I have stress-free BC on curved boundaries.  A series of error
>>> >> messages led me to believe that I had to use the stress formulation,
>>> >> and
>>> >> that this required me to use Pn/Pn-2.  Is this not the case?
>>> >>
>>> >> Best,
>>> >>
>>> >> David
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>>>
>>
>