<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Hi, Iulian<br><br>If my understanding is correct, you are using mesh/facet data to create linear/smooth geometry of surfaces and curves. After this, are you providing query functions for properties of those geometries, and if possible, allowing any modification of those geometries? If you are at least providing or going to provide query of the geometry that you created, these functions should be integrated to CGM/geom/facet directory. <br><br>At least CGM facet needs these mesh-to-geometry functions too.<br><br>Jane<br><br>--- On <b>Mon, 2/14/11, Hong-Jun Kim <i><hongjun@mcs.anl.gov></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Hong-Jun Kim <hongjun@mcs.anl.gov><br>Subject: Re: [MOAB-dev] naming conventions?<br>To: moab-dev@mcs.anl.gov<br>Date: Monday, February 14,
2011, 10:33 AM<br><br><div class="plainMail">I hope it has all information in the name as "mbfacetgeom" not confused by others or future tools.<br><br>Hong-Jun<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>> From: "Iulian Grindeanu" <<a ymailto="mailto:iulian@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=iulian@mcs.anl.gov">iulian@mcs.anl.gov</a>><br>> To: "Tim Tautges" <<a ymailto="mailto:tautges@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=tautges@mcs.anl.gov">tautges@mcs.anl.gov</a>><br>> Cc: <a ymailto="mailto:moab-dev@mcs.anl.gov" href="/mc/compose?to=moab-dev@mcs.anl.gov">moab-dev@mcs.anl.gov</a><br>> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:04:20 AM<br>> Subject: [MOAB-dev] naming conventions?<br>> Hello,<br>> I would like to commit a new tool to moab, one for mesh-based<br>> geometry.<br>> What should be a good name?<br>> Right now, the tool is called mbfacet, but this name could be confused<br>> with faceting in CGM. It is, in a way, an
inverse process, mesh<br>> populated with right sets and tags is interpreted as geometry (linear<br>> or smooth). The main class is called FBEngine (Facet Based Engine),<br>> which will implement a lot of iGeom-like methods.<br>> <br>> I was thinking also mbgeom (for mesh based geometry), but mb usually<br>> stands for moab :(<br>> <br>> Does anybody have better suggestions?<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Iulian<br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>
<hr size=1>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49678/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL"> Get your own web address.</a><br> Have a HUGE year through <a href="
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49678/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL">Yahoo! Small Business.</a>