[POOL] Pool Final Results and New Session

[Roger Sersted]

If needed, I can play tonight.

I'm definitely not a fan of the "2:1" for lower handicapped players.  If you're 
<10 and the higher of the two, that is just not fair.  This type of match-up 
only happens a couple times per session, so I think its impact on overall time 
is negligible.

Roger S.

On 01/06/2015 02:18 PM, John Valdes wrote:
> Moe,
>
> Officially, as expected, we finished in 4th place for the Fall
> session, only 2 wins out of a 3-way tie for 1st, which was shared
> between Dean's, Bob Daun's and Melanie's teams.  Great job all!  For
> our efforts, we won $250 which we can use for our fees and dues for
> the Winter session; that should last us roughly 5 weeks.
>
> If you couldn't tell by looking out the window, Winter starts now. :)
> Tonight is the first night of the Winter session.  If you played last
> session but won't be able to play this session, please let me know
> ASAP.
>
> A new handicap table has been proposed for this session.  The limits
> of each bracket were reduced by roughly 10 (eg, what was the 50-79
> bracket is now 40-69), and a new bracket for when the highest
> handicapped player's handicap is < 10 has been added.   The intent is
> to slightly improve the matchups for lower handicap players and make
> matches between really low handicap players go faster (eg, rather than
> having a 3:2 matchup it'd be a 2:1 matchup).  See the attached
> tables.  The proposed changes look OK to me, but if you have any
> objections, please let me know.
>
> Hope to see you all at Q!
>
> John
>