[POOL] Fwd: Argonne Pool League PROPOSED CHANGES

[Craig Stacey]

Wait, you get to shoot again if you *didn't* sink anything on the break?
--
Craig


On Sep 5, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Brian R. Toonen wrote:

> I disagree.  The lag is still important.  If you get to break, you  
> also get
> to shoot first, whether or not you dropped anything on the break.
>
> Note: I'm not fighting for rules 3 and 4.  I really don't have a  
> strong
> opinion one way or another.
>
> --brian
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: owner-mcs-pool at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-mcs- 
> pool at mcs.anl.gov] On
> |Behalf Of Craig Stacey
> |Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 16:10
> |To: mcs-pool at mcs.anl.gov
> |Subject: Re: [POOL] Fwd: Argonne Pool League PROPOSED CHANGES
> |
> |My take on rules 3 and 4 is this -- why bother lagging for break or
> |trying to win the lag?  There's absolutely no benefit to breaking.
> |
> |On Sep 5, 2007, at  3:37 PM, Roger Sersted wrote:
> |
> |
> |>> |> 3) The table is always open after the break.
> |>> |> 4) 8-ball on the break is *not* a win.