<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.moz-txt-tag
        {mso-style-name:moz-txt-tag;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I’d like to know more about this too. We’ve been
using the beta H.264 VIC client for a while now and it would be nice to know what
progress is being made. The only thing I would say is that, well, the
performance hit is shockingly bad in the current H.264 VIC client. What
interests me much more is the MPEG-4 codec also offered. It has roughly a
quarter of the load of H.264 with very comparable quality. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>We don’t currently substitute the VIC tool provided in
AG3.1 for the beta version, since it’s beta and all. Instead we use the
beta version of VIC and MPEG-4 for meetings between our 2 sites when there are
problems with the bridges (we’re limited to unicast at RAL). Since you
can launch VIC and RAT as unicast tools just pointing at the remote site IP, it’s
something we run off a batch script. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Adam Horwich.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><b><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
owner-ag-tech@mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-tech@mcs.anl.gov] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jimmy
Miklavcic<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 28 January 2008 23:18<br>
<b>To:</b> ag-tech<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [AG-TECH] Any more H.264 news?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Has
there been any more progress with H.264 and AG 3.1? Also has anyone seen the
new Osprey 700 HD?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Jimmy</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <span class=moz-txt-tag>-- </span><br>
Jimmy Miklavcic <br>
Multimedia Specialist <br>
<span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><a
href="mailto:Jimmy.Miklavcic@utah.edu"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'>Jimmy.Miklavcic@utah.edu</span></a></span>
<br>
<br>
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH <br>
CTR FOR HIGH PERFORM COMPUTING <br>
155 SOUTH 1452 EAST RM 405 <br>
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112-0190 <br>
<br>
Office: 801.585.9335 <br>
Fax: 801.585.5366 <br>
<br>
<span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><a
href="http://www.anotherlanguage.org/"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'>http://www.anotherlanguage.org</span></a></span>
<span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>