[AG-TECH] NAT issues

[Steve Gallo]

My guess would be that it's less cost because you need less
IP addresses.  Now manpower for setting it all up is another
story... :)

Steve


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov]On
> Behalf Of Tim Chown
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 9:48 AM
> To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] NAT issues
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 08:14:20AM -0600, Jeremy Mann wrote:
> > 
> > Tim Chown said:
> > > It would be easier to remove the NAT and use global IP addressing,
> > > replacing
> > > the NAT with something that can firewall that traffic as well as route it?
> > >
> > > Why are you using NAT?
> > 
> > NATing is cheaper, it comes with iptables and Linux ;)
> 
> Define cheap :)
> 
> Tim
>