Inquiry on AG 2 - Unicast
Robert Olson
olson at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Mar 17 12:19:35 CST 2004
At 11:43 AM 3/17/2004, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>1) We have a bridging solution in AG-2 so that probably addresses their
>concern about moving, they can still unicast. The sets of venues we bridge
>in ag1 and ag2 should probably be synchronized (bob can you generate a list
>and send it in this thread?), I'm guessing the lists are pretty close.
I thought we already had these aligned.
>2) Why in the world are we msb bridging ncsa venues? That seems like
>something that should have come up for discussion so I had an opportunity to
>dissent -- I might have been out voted, but not having the chance to
>disagree is an extremely frustrating situation.
We've been doing this for at least a couple years just for the PNL folks.
The issue is that their firewall folks are very restrictive, but would open
up a conduit to ANL (since ANL is another national lab). The NCSA venues
are there because they have a need to connect to meetings held in those venues.
--bob
More information about the ag-dev
mailing list