FW: Report - Interim Release

Ivan R. Judson judson at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Aug 23 08:17:29 CDT 2002



..........
Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
Futures Laboratory .~.  630 252 0920
Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Daw [mailto:mike.daw at man.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 7:19 AM
> To: Stephen Booth; Alan J. Flavell; Brian Gilmore; Chris 
> Osland; David Boyd; David De Roure; David Hutchison; David 
> Salmon; Henry Hughes; Ivan R. Judson; Jeremy Sharp; John 
> Brooke; John Gordon; Kate Caldwell; Liz Carver; Malcolm 
> Atkinson; Mark Cavanagh; Mark Hayes; Mike Giles; Paul 
> Jeffreys; Richard Ansorge; Stewart Macneill; Sue Rogers
> Subject: Report - Interim Release
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Attached is the whole document as it currently stands (hence 
> 'Interim'). I'm sending it out now to give you as much notice 
> as possible of quite big changes to the layout and the 
> Recommendations. Hopefully, they'll be non-controversial. I 
> think they improve the whole thing quite a lot. Another, more 
> polished, version will come out this afternoon.
> 
> Feedback please.
> 
> The changes I wanted you to know about are:
> 
> 1. New structure of document: Exec Summary first, 
> Recommendations second, Technical Summary (was 'Summary') 
> third. Then core chapters. You might notice that I'm not sure 
> where the Introduction chapter will go. Perhaps I'll get rid 
> of it and replace it with just the Contributors (which will 
> appear after the title page) first. Ideas welcome.
> 
> 2. The bulleted recommendations is now the first thing you 
> see in the Recommendations chapter.
> 
> 3. The Recommendations are no longer prioritised. The more I 
> thought about this, the more I thought it was a bad idea. No 
> one fed back to me with a different priority order, but I 
> didn't even think about the first order they were in. Also, I 
> don't think any order we put on it will make any difference 
> to the prospect for these things getting funded and actually 
> happening.
> 
> 4. The scenarios are no longer in the Recommendations. 
> However, they are referenced there and come immediately 
> afterwards in a more appropriate place for them (the 
> newly-named 'Technical Summary').
> 
> 5. Please read the Recommendations chapter. It's got a big 
> change in the Access Grid Support recommendation prompted by 
> Henry and I've fiddled with the R&D section a bit because of 
> comments from Ivan and other anonymous persons(!). There are 
> numerous other smaller changes prompted by Alan, Henry, 
> Brian, Kate and John.
> 
> I'll reply to people individually too, because there's a 
> couple of suggested changes that I *haven't* put in and they 
> deserve explanation.
> 
> --Mike
> 
> -----------------------oOo-----------------------
> Michael Daw
> Computer Services for Academic Research (CSAR)
> 
> Manchester Computing, Kilburn Building,
> University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
> 
> Tel: +44 (0)161 275 7026
> Fax: +44 (0)161 275 6800
> Email: michael.daw at man.ac.uk
> 
http://www.csar.cfs.ac.uk/staff/daw/
-----------------------OoO-----------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WholeReport_0.7.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 298496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20020823/63ef87f8/attachment.doc>


More information about the ag-dev mailing list